Thanks Mandy.
Pushed with the following description as we discussed offline:
The interfaces and classes in this package came from Document Object
Model (DOM) Level 3 XPath Specification, Working Draft 20 August 2002.
Refer to Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 XPath Specification,
Version 1.0, W3C Working Group Note 26 February 2004 except that the
values of XPathException.INVALID_EXPRESSION_ERR and
XPathException.TYPE_ERR are 1 and 2 respectively (instead of 51 and 52).
Best,
Joe
On 6/15/2017 11:52 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jun 15, 2017, at 10:28 AM, huizhe wang <huizhe.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Mandy,
Removed the change to module-info.java. While adding a description that the
xpath package was from a working draft, I felt compelled to mention the latest
specification. So essentially going back to your previous suggestion,
explaining the difference between the working draft and the latest.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk9/8182111/webrev02/
This looks okay. Most of the class spec already have @since 1.4 and the
javadoc was published together with the deployment guide.
"The difference from the latest...”
Refer to Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 XPath Specification, Version 1.0,
W3C Working Group Note 26 February 2004 except that the values of
XPathException.INVALID_EXPRESSION_ERR and XPathException.TYPE_ERR are 2 and 52
instead of 1 and 51 respectively.
No need to see an updated webrev.
thanks
Mandy
