Hi Jaroslav,
What we should do with 8182701? Do you still need JVMCI changes?
Note, your changes to Graal [GR-5435] were integrated recently into JDK
(jdk10/hs):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186158
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 8/14/17 10:06 AM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
On čtvrtek 3. srpna 2017 17:03:39 CEST Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
On čtvrtek 27. července 2017 15:01:17 CEST Alan Bateman wrote:
On 27/07/2017 10:07, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Yes, it seems like a desirable goal to let Graal compiler work with just
java.base. Is there a description how to build JDK9/10 with just
java.base
that I could follow and test against?
You can use jlink to create a run-time image that only contains
java.base (jlink --module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods --add-modules java.base
--output smalljre).
Status update: I've just tried to run Graal compiler against JDK9 with only
java.base and jdk.internal.vm.ci modules, and there are some problems. I
need to resolve them first before I provide updated version of my patch.
FYI: As of
https://github.com/graalvm/graal/commit/ca9071941a1be7f1a3725529ecc231ff621d5ed0
the Graal compiler can run with java.base, jdk.unsupported and jdk.vm.ci only
modules. But it wasn't easy, especially the
http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/PropertyChangeListener required a bit of work.
-jt
