> On 25 Aug 2017, at 00:47, stanislav lukyanov <stanislav.lukya...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > > On 24.08.2017 23:43, Paul Sandoz wrote: >>> On 23 Aug 2017, at 23:49, stanislav lukyanov >>> <stanislav.lukya...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> I still think that instead of debugging this spec and making sure that it >>> behaves similarly to `asType` >>> it would be better to keep delegating to the implied `asType` and =ch here, >>> rather than re-purposing asType and by extension asVarargsCollector (“as if >>> by asType but …”), but i do take your point (IIRC) that the specification >>> of asVarargsCollector could duplicate some common specification text. > Yes, I guess duplicating the text would help to avoid inconsistencies. > Should I file an RFE (P5?) for synchronizing the texts of > invokeWithArguments, asVaragsCollector and possibly asType? >
Yes please, that would be useful. If you could suggest appropriate text even better :-) It might be best to add a section to the package html that can be linked to. Paul.
