Hi, >From https://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin9.html:
> Originally (http://www.indigo.ie/egt/standards/iso8859/latin00.html) the project > which lead to the creation of ISO Latin 9 used the working name "Latin Alphabet > Number Zero" for it. Therefore it has often been referred to as "Latin 0". I don't think it should be included in the aliases. Florent On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Ulf Zibis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again, > > Am 31.08.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Xueming Shen: > > The 8859-16 aliases are the copy/paste from > https://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets/character-sets.xhtml > > From the same page we have the followings for 8859-15 > ISO_8859-15 > Latin-9 > csISO885915 > > It appears only the first one is listed in our alias list (explicitly > commented). > Don't have the memory for the history (8859-15 was added a long time ago), > not sure whether the other two were missed at the very beginning or were > added later in the iana. Since we are here, I added them in. > > > Fine! > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8186751/webrev > (the old one is copied to webrev.00) > > > - I think, the comment should now be in plural: # IANA alias > *es *- Also I think, it would make sense to at least add "ISO8859-16" and > "ISO8859_16" as # Other aliases > - "ISO-8859-15" must not be listed as alias, as it already is the > canonical name. > - Not sure, where "LATIN0" and "csISOlatin0" come from. > > -Ulf > > -- [image: Nuxeo] Florent Guillaume Head of R&D Twitter: @efge
