>> Hi Matthias, >>
>> I have closed your bug JDK-8188901 in favor of the bug that Sherman had >> opened before: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188869. >> >> Please post a webrev for the change as suggested by Claes. > >Sounds good to me. > >In addition to being a cleanup, the move to use java.time did provide a >speedup, however, which >might become significant when loading lots of jar files. > >I've not found my notes on how big this speed-up was (I recall ~3x in > micros), but if anyone has time > to fix (and test) the overflows without reverting to java.util.Date then > we might be able to keep most > of that gain intact.? This can of course be considered a follow-up, or > ignored. > Hi Claes, to me it looks like the old jdk8 coding is not slower than the jdk9/10 coding . Best regards, Matthias
