> On 31 Oct 2017, at 11:24, Brian Goetz <brian.go...@oracle.com> wrote: > > While I agree that the overflow-detecting constraint on min/max in the early > version was too aggressive, you could reasonably choose to enforce the > constraint that if count == 0, then so should sum, min, and max. >
I’m on the fence on this one. Joe is going to follow up with another issue for DoubleSummaryStatistics adjusting to a varargs constructor and and may consider doing this at the same time. Paul. > On 10/30/2017 6:49 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> After some hiatus here is an updated webrev, i made some tweaks to the >> JavaDoc: >> >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk10/JDK-8178117-summary-constructors/webrev/ >> >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk10/JDK-8178117-summary-constructors/webrev/> >> >> And the CSR: >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190381 >> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190381> >> >> The support for a double sum of consisting of an array of double is going >> beyond my complexity budget for this feature. If that is deemed important >> later on we can add another constructor. >> >> Paul. >>
