> On 8 Nov 2017, at 14:20, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> 685 final Node<E> succ(Node<E> p) {
> 686 // TODO: should we skip deleted nodes here?
>
> Is the comment still relevant?
>
> It's still an open question, like what's the best GC strategy, or should
> ArrayList automatically shrink (as well as grow) its backing array?
Ok, i thought it might be somewhat related to skipping over null nodes and thus
related to the linearizability fixes.
Paul.
