> On 8 Nov 2017, at 14:20, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > 685 final Node<E> succ(Node<E> p) { > 686 // TODO: should we skip deleted nodes here? > > Is the comment still relevant? > > It's still an open question, like what's the best GC strategy, or should > ArrayList automatically shrink (as well as grow) its backing array?
Ok, i thought it might be somewhat related to skipping over null nodes and thus related to the linearizability fixes. Paul.