On 11/28/2017 01:11 PM, Roger Riggs wrote: > Hi, > > So this thread died out a while ago with some alternatives discussed and > no clear short term solution. > I'd be happy if someone closer to the ThreadPoolExecutor would be able > to take another look at the issues. > For the time being, it is lower down on my priorities.
I still think the best move is to delete the method, and tweak the documentation. -Doug
