On 11/29/2017 01:43 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > SubmissionPublisher > -- > > 1004 // Order-sensitive field declarations > > Is this still relevant
Not really; layout is now discussed in class-level doc. Removed. Thanks. > > 81 * <p>A single SubmissionPublisher may be shared among multiple > 82 * sources. Actions in a source thread prior to publishing an item or > 83 * issuing a signal <a href="package-summary.html#MemoryVisibility"> > 84 * <i>happen-before</i></a> actions subsequent to the corresponding > 85 * access by each subscriber. But reported estimates of lag and demand > 86 * are designed for use in monitoring, not for synchronization > 87 * control, and may reflect stale or inaccurate views of progress. > > We probably need a CSR for this. Yeah, I guess so, even though it is just a clarification. > > Is “corresponding access by each subscriber” referring to access of the > published item by each subscriber? > Yes. And also for signals like closeExceptionally exceptions. This seems to cover both cases, but maybe could be improved. -Doug
