> On Jan 24, 2018, at 3:36 AM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 23/01/2018 22:40, mandy chung wrote: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk11/webrevs/8191170/webrev.00/index.html >> >> >> A small adjustment in the javadoc. It clarifies what an empty value of >> "java.class.path" property is interpreted by the built-in application class >> loader. > It looks okay but I had to read it a few times.
Same here. > A few suggestions that might make it a bit easier to read: > > "It reads the system property java.class.path ..." => "The system property > java.class.path is read ..." > > "is named or not" => "is named or unnamed". > > "whether the initial module" => "whether the initial module (the module > containing the main class)”. +1 to those. That sufficiently explains the initial module. "If named, the built-in system class loader will have no class path i.e. only find classes and resources only from the application module path;” => “If named, the built-in system class loader will have no class path and will search for classes and resources using the application module path;" Paul.
