On 28/02/2018 19:54, Lance Andersen wrote:
Thanks. I checked the latest webrev (moving the package description to
package-info.java and the langtools dot test) and it all looks good to me.
Still waiting to see what changes are made to the PDF spec, that is
still needing to be completed. So I think for now, we go with what we
have and can circle back if needed.
Is there any XA text from the original JTA spec that should be added
to the module description as part of this? Another way to ask this is
whether the JTA 1.3 drops any text dealing with the XA part.