On 2018-03-12 16:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
This looks okay to me.
In case anyone wonders, this is one of several jlink plugins that are
tightly coupled to java.base. They are never run when the java.base
going into target run-time image doesn't have the same feature and
interim version as the version that the plugins were developed for.
Right. Support for loading a different implementation of
java.lang.invoke and related code into the jlink-executing JVM to
generate bytecode suitable for another version of java.base would
require a lot of refurbishing of some rather tricky and sensitive code.