On Mar 21, 2018, at 1:23 PM, Stuart Marks <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Perhaps instead the verbiage just needs to be changed to, e.g.,
>>
>> “The implementation in this class simply invokes {@link
>> #write(byte[],int,int) write(b, 0, b.length)}.”
> I don't think you want to specify this detail about the implementation.
>
> Consider a possible future refactoring, where writeBytes() calls some
> internal method instead of calling write(b, 0, b.length). This might be done,
> for example, to leverage an intrinsic, or to avoid unnecessary bounds checks,
> or for some other reason we can't imagine at the moment.
>
> Such a refactoring would be prohibited by an @implSpec.
Why then not an @implNote instead of an @apiNote?
Thanks,
Brian
