Hi Christoph On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Look at this blog: > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aix-symbol-visibility-part2/index.html > > if I understand it correctly, the xlc 12 default behavior should be like what > we'd expect from -qvisibility=hidden. >
Where in this article do you read this? ..Thomas > Best regards > Christoph > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: build-dev [mailto:build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of >> Thomas Stüfe >> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2018 06:55 >> To: Volker Simonis <volker.simo...@gmail.com>; Baesken, Matthias >> <matthias.baes...@sap.com> >> Cc: Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com>; ppc-aix-port- >> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; build- >> d...@openjdk.java.net >> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc >> 12.1 >> >> Hi, >> >> This was added by "8200178: Remove mapfiles for JDK native libraries". >> But if the flag is not accepted, what is the default behavior? Do we >> now export everything? >> >> I'd like to understand this first before removing the flag to get rid >> of the warnings. >> >> Best Regards, Thomas >> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Volker Simonis >> <volker.simo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Matthias, >> > >> > after Bhaktavatsal Reddy's report about the problems with >> > "-qvisibility" with xlC 13 and taking into account that we can't test >> > this anyway because we don't currently have xlC 13 >> > on our machines I think it would be best to completely remove this >> > option for now on AIX. Once we get xlC 13 we can revisit the issue. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Volker >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Bhaktavatsal R Maram >> > <bhama...@in.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Matthias, >> >> >> >> At this point, I think we can remove the flag as you found that it is not >> supported in XLC < 13. And with XLC 13, it require more work to use this >> flag. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bhaktavatsal Reddy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----"Baesken, Matthias" <matthias.baes...@sap.com> wrote: ----- >> >> To: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.lan...@sap.com>, "'build- >> d...@openjdk.java.net'" <build-...@openjdk.java.net>, "ppc-aix-port- >> d...@openjdk.java.net" <ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net>, "core-libs- >> d...@openjdk.java.net" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net> >> >> From: "Baesken, Matthias" <matthias.baes...@sap.com> >> >> Date: 04/26/2018 08:23PM >> >> Cc: "Simonis, Volker" <volker.simo...@sap.com>, Bhaktavatsal R Maram >> <bhama...@in.ibm.com> >> >> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on >> >> xlc >> 12.1 >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello Christoph, I think all XLC versions < 12.1 are unsupported >> >> (and >> probably not working anyway) for the OpenJDK build . >> >> I am only aware of XLC versions 12.1 and 13.1 which work / in >> >> case of >> 13.1 “might” work for OpenJDK compilation . >> >> And for 12.1 I want to remove the flags . >> >> >> >> ( waiting for the feedback of Bhaktavatsal Reddy , in case he >> >> prefers it >> I remove them for all xlC versions including 13.1 ) >> >> >> >> Best regards, Matthias >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Langer, Christoph >> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:38 >> >> To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; 'build- >> d...@openjdk.java.net' <build-...@openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port- >> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net >> >> Cc: Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com> >> >> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on >> >> xlc >> 12.1 >> >> >> >> Hi Matthias, >> >> >> >> to me the change in principal looks good. >> >> >> >> I’m wondering if it is possible to do a comparison like xlc < 13 (e.g. >> >> extract >> major number before the first dot, then compare numerically) – but maybe it >> is too complicated and the current single version compare suits our needs ? >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Christoph >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Baesken, Matthias >> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:14 >> >> To: 'build-...@openjdk.java.net' <build-...@openjdk.java.net>; ppc- >> aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net >> >> Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; Simonis, Volker >> <volker.simo...@sap.com> >> >> Subject: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc >> >> 12.1 >> >> >> >> Hello , could you please review this small adjustment to the symbol >> visibility compilation settings on AIX ? >> >> Currently we use XLC 12.1 to compile JDK on AIX . >> >> >> >> However XLC 12.1 does not support the “-qvisibility=hidden” setting >> currently set on AIX. >> >> It was introduced with XLC 13.1 . Christoph found some info about it >> >> here >> : >> >> >> >> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aix-symbol- >> visibility-part2/index.html >> >> >> >> Setting it only generates hundreds of warnings in the build log , >> warnings look like this : >> >> XlC12.1 >> >> >> >> bash-4.4$ xlC -qversion >> >> IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1 (5765-J02, 5725-C72) >> >> Version: 12.01.0000.0019 >> >> >> >> bash-4.4$ xlC -qvisibility=hidden sizeof.c -o sizeof_aixxlc >> >> 1506-173 (W) Option visibility=hidden is not valid. Enter xlC for list >> >> of valid >> options. >> >> >> >> Compare to XLC13.1 >> >> >> >> bash-3.00$ xlC -qversion >> >> IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V13.1 (5725-C72, 5765-J07) >> >> Version: 13.01.0000.0008 >> >> bash-3.00$ xlC -qvisibility=default sizeof.c -o sizeof_aixxlc >> >> bash-3.00$ xlC -qvisibility=hidden sizeof.c -o sizeof_aixxlc >> >> >> >> >> >> So it is better to avoid setting these flags when using xlc12.1 . >> >> Please review : >> >> >> >> Bug : >> >> >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202322 >> >> >> >> Change : >> >> >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8202322/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, Matthias >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>