Hi Brain and Roger,
Thank you very much for your hint about submitting patches.
In the meantime I got feeback [1] from Xueming Shen and I sent two
(much) smaller portions [2] and [3] which makes [5] now obsolete.
I saw through my own messages again and found them having the patches
attached. Both [2] and [3] have their patches attached in the email I
sent as well as displayed when viewing the message in the mail archive
as a link at the bottom. While not all my previous messages were in that
form, I see that webrev form from me as not an author as in [4] is not
useful and would guess this should be all right for [2] and [3] or else,
please, let me know.
In short summary, I'd be glad to find a sponsor or get feedback for [2]
and [3].
Regards,
Philipp
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052946.html
[2]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052962.html
[3]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052963.html
[4]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052942.html
[5]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052921.html
On 04.05.2018 22:24, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
For more specifics about allowed attachment types see [1].
Brian
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/code-tools-dev/2018-March/000378.html
On May 4, 2018, at 12:51 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com
<mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Just a reminder that OpenJDK can *only* accept patches
viacr.openjdk.java.net <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/>
(as an author) or inline or attached in email.
