> On Jun 22, 2018, at 5:17 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 6/22/18 3:58 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi Smita,
>> I am ok with it if Vladimir is :-) One slight concern is this may be biasing
>> towards the x86 implementation of the intrinsic.
>
> Looking on code and it will be a lot of changes in Base64.java. I am concern
> about that late in JDK 11.
>
> I think we should keep duplicated code for x86 intrinsic as Smita suggested.
> And we can return to this when/if we intrinsify Decoder too.
>
Agreed.
Paul.
>> I dunno if an int[] table is as useful for an AARCH64 intrinsic.
>
> We should ask RH to check.
>
> But I think SPARC is better operating on 32-bit values than 16-bit (at least
> it was issue before).
>
> Vladimir
>
