On 7/10/18 4:04 PM, Éamonn McManus wrote:
Do you know any other example?

Here's an example from the JDK itself:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk11/file/2a89e80301b1/src/java.desktop/share/classes/sun/font/Type1Font.java#l101

Thanks Eamonn.

I also found a few other similar usages in JDK to initialize
with an "empty" WeakReference field that may be updated with
a weak ref with a referent at runtime so that the code can
always assume this field is non-null.

Due to the current usage and compatibility risk, not worth
to enforce non-null referent.

Mandy

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 10:11, mandy chung <[email protected]> wrote:



On 7/9/18 11:59 PM, Peter Levart wrote:


There are situations where being able to create a XxxReference without a
referent is useful. For example, imagine a doubly-linked list of
WeakReference subclasses - a special instance without a referent can be
used as the head of such list that never goes away and simplifies
insertion/deletion logic, etc...

JDK's java.lang.ref.Cleaner API uses such scheme in its implementation
(see jdk.internal.ref.CleanerImpl.[Phantom|Weak|Soft]CleanableRef no-arg
constructors).

Thanks for pointing this out.  It's used as a convenience and it's
not hard to handle insertion/deletion logic though.   Another
alternative may be to create an object as the strongly reachable
referent.  I wonder if any existing code depends on null referent
like the cleaner case and the compatibility risk.  Do you know
any other example?

Mandy

Reply via email to