> On 19 Jul 2018, at 15:42, Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> ... > > Note that making this a security property for all general cases may have > performance implications in certain scenarios since the java.security file > will need to be loaded and fully parsed before it can be used. If you are > already parsing the java.security file for something else (which is probably > the case for jdk.net.includeInExceptions), then it should be fine, but that > may not always be the case if this is made into a more general property. Just > something to think about …
Good point Sean. My concern is more along the lines of a whole plethora of specific properties being added, rather than the implications of such. That should be scrutinised separately. What I am suggesting is to generalise the existing property so that it can, if applicable, be used in other areas. Not that it must be used in all other areas. The current proposal, to add a new property, already has this concern. What I am suggesting does not cause the file to be parsed any more than it would already. -Chris.
