And forgot to lead with: Thanks, Pengfei! That helps a great deal. Ted Neward Technologist and Leader T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526 http://www.newardassociates.com
-----Original Message----- From: Pengfei Li <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:26 PM To: [email protected]; 'Alan Bateman' <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; nd <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r Ted, I just use --disable-warnings-as-errors in bash configure command to build jdk 10/11 on Ubuntu 18. -- Thanks, Pengfei > > Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking > purposes), what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going > to be backported? Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best > way to do that), or somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I > could use advice/assistance on either approach. > > Ted Neward > Technologist and Leader > T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526 > http://www.newardassociates.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Bateman <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM > To: [email protected]; 'Pengfei Li' <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; 'nd' <[email protected]>; core-libs- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than > readdir_r > > On 03/08/2018 20:26, [email protected] wrote: > > Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in > > pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer > > not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I > > can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out > > fairly shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on. > > > The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in > jdk/jdk for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that > came up and are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't > think there has been any discussion yet about back porting. > > -Alan
