Re: RFR: 8207851 JEP Draft: Support ByteBuffer mapped over non-volatile memory

[Alan Bateman]

On 03/10/2018 10:14, Andrew Dinn wrote:
:
Sure, I'd be happy to change this.
Would READ_ONLY_SYNC and READ_WRITE_SYNC be suitable alternatives? Or do
you have something else in mind?

I think that works but it means looking at the proposed 
MappedByteBuffer::isPersistent too. MappedByteBuffer hasn't needed 
methods to test if the mapping is read-only, read-write or private 
mapping and I wonder if isPersistent is really needed.

-Alan