> On 30 Oct 2018, at 17:03, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Naoto,
>
> Looks fine. The wording should allow future Japanese era to be defined
> without
> the timing being tightly coupled to java specification updates.
+1
Suggest: "The defined ** era’s {@link #getValue} ** is expected
to have a consecutive integer associated with it.”
I suspect that the wording here has deliberately chosen, but I
wonder if it could be tightened a little?
`values()` should return an array of eras whose values are in a
contiguous range, no? If so, can this be specified?
-Chris.
> Thanks, Roger
>
> On 10/30/2018 12:29 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Updated the webrev. Please review.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8212941/webrev.03/
