Hello,
Please review the small change to address
JDK-8213444: Missing emphasis for term being defined
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8213444.0/
Patch below.
The emphasis markup is added to the "present" term in symmetry with the
other terms being defined. Additionally, the formatting of some text in
a {@code } structure is improved.
The analogous list of definitions in javax.lang.model.AnnotatedConstruct
already use emphasis for all the defined terms.
Thanks,
-Joe
---
old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AnnotatedElement.java
2018-11-06 21:55:58.195000000 -0800
+++
new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AnnotatedElement.java
2018-11-06 21:55:58.027000000 -0800
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
* exactly one annotation whose value element contains <i>A</i> and whose
* type is the containing annotation type of <i>A</i> 's type.
*
- * <li>An annotation <i>A</i> is present on an element <i>E</i> if either:
+ * <li>An annotation <i>A</i> is <em>present</em> on an element
<i>E</i> if either:
*
* <ul>
*
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@
* </tbody>
* </table>
*
- * <p>For an invocation of {@code get[Declared]AnnotationsByType( Class <
- * T >)}, the order of annotations which are directly or indirectly
+ * <p>For an invocation of {@code get[Declared]AnnotationsByType(Class
<T>)},
+ * the order of annotations which are directly or indirectly
* present on an element <i>E</i> is computed as if indirectly present
* annotations on <i>E</i> are directly present on <i>E</i> in place
* of their container annotation, in the order in which they appear in
