Hi Joe,
1. It looks as if the parser will not complain if the root element
is seen twice - and it looks as if it is a supported feature
since the previous implementation also had a counter.
Should this be tested?
If this is a feature and multiple roots are supported
then the new impl might have an issue with allowing only
one comment (maybe).
2. The rootElm qName is now set at two locations. Is the overridden
method below still needed? Could it have been used instead of
introducing a new startDTD method?
212 @Override
213 public void notationDecl(String name, String publicId, String
systemId) throws SAXException {
214 rootElm = name;
215 }
best regards,
-- daniel
On 15/11/2018 20:26, Joe Wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I deleted the endDTD method. It could have been used to signal the end
of DTD parsing and therefore serve as a validation point. However, the
parser would have thrown Exceptions if a DTD parsing wasn't completed
properly, that seems to make an endDTD check unnecessary, at least as
the current parser impl goes.
The small footprint parser has its problems, for example, not providing
specific error messages when things go wrong. But since this is a
Properties usage only, it serves the purpose well enough.
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk12/8213325/webrev_v02/
Previous:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk12/8213325/webrev_v01/
Best regards,
Joe
On 11/14/18, 2:32 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Joe,
I do not see where the new DTDHandler::endDTD methos is called.
Is that an oversight or is there more magic?
best regards,
-- daniel
On 14/11/2018 05:18, Joe Wang wrote:
Hi,
Please review a patch to bring the small footprint parser for
java.util.Properties compliant with the specification.
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213325
webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk12/8213325/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
