Hi David, Thanks for pointing that out!
>We need to see how this example work in that case. I guess anyone involved could have straight away two test cases: one from the bug itself and another from the observation above. In any case. looking forward for that being fixed. I would also be happy to be able to help with anything if needed. Thanks and regards, Sergei On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 12:03, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > Just FYI we're in the process of moving away from using anonymous > classes for lambda's to using an extended Lookup.defineClass API - see: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171335 > > this is being done under Project Valhalla, with current work in the > nestmates branch. > > We need to see how this example work in that case. > > Cheers, > David > > On 8/12/2018 9:53 am, Sergey wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Recently I've stumbled upon this bug > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213465 > > which is named the same way as in the header of an email. I've done a > > little bit of > > investigation and keen to fix it. Though I'm afraid that most likely fix > > wouldn't be just > > a one-liner. Thus I want to ask for a little bit of a guidance and make > > sure, that I do not cross > > anyone else. With that being said, if ticket isn't in progress and no one > > minds I want to make > > an attempt on it. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Sergei > > >
