Hi Michihiro,

the shared code looks good to me, now.

Looks like the PPC64 is not consistent any more.
Where do you enable UseCharacterCompareIntrinsics on PPC64?
Why aren't you using it for match_rule_supported in the ad file?
I think has_darn could be used to enable it in vm_version_ppc.

Best regards,
Martin


-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> 
Sent: Montag, 10. Dezember 2018 20:33
To: Michihiro Horie <ho...@jp.ibm.com>; Gustavo Romero 
<grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; 
Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com>; Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>; 
Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com>
Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics for 
isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace

On 12/9/18 5:28 PM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your review. I also fixed the copyright in intrinsicnode.hpp.
> 
>  >Did you look on code generated by C2 with your latest changes?
> Yes,I usually check generated code with Oprofile and they were as expected 
> like:
> :
> 90 0.0905 : 3fff64c27654: rlwinm r12,r9,24,8,31
> 12 0.0121 : 3fff64c27658: li r11,14640
> 15 0.0151 : 3fff64c2765c: cmprb cr5,0,r31,r11
> 5527 5.5587 : 3fff64c27660: setb r11,cr5
> 36010 36.2164 : 3fff64c27664: stb r11,16(r15)

Good.

> :
> 
> I found a CSR FAQ that mentions adding a diagnostic flag do not need CSR 
> process. This time I do not need CSR.
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/csr/CSR+FAQs

Thank is correct.

> 
> Hi Gustavo,
> Could I ask you to sponsor the latest change webrev.05? I would like you to 
> test it on your P9 node too.

Thanks,
Vladimir

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Michihiro,
> IBM Research - Tokyo
> 
> Inactive hide details for Vladimir Kozlov ---2018/12/08 03:48:04---From: 
> Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> 
> To: RogerVladimir Kozlov ---2018/12/08 03:48:04---From: Vladimir Kozlov 
> <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com> To: Roger Riggs 
> <roger.ri...@oracle.com>, Michihiro Horie <ho...@jp.ibm.com>
> 
> From: Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
> To: Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>, Michihiro Horie <ho...@jp.ibm.com>
> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net, hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net, 
> martin.do...@sap.com, volker.simo...@sap.com
> Date: 2018/12/08 03:48
> Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics for 
> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Michihiro,
> 
> Hotspot changes looks fine.
> Did you look on code generated by C2 with your latest changes?
> 
> And Copyright year change in intrinsicnode.hpp is incorrect:
> 
> - * Copyright (c) 2015, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> 
> Should be
> 
> * Copyright (c) 2015, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> 
> On 12/7/18 10:08 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>  > Hi Michihiro,
>  >
>  > Looks fine with the updates.
>  >
>  > Its great that the change to isDigit is beneficial on other platforms too.
>  >
>  > A very small editorial:
>  >    There should be a comma  "," after the 2018 in the copyright of:
>  >    test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/Characters.java
>  >
>  > Thanks, Roger
>  >
>  >
>  > On 12/07/2018 03:13 AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Hi Roger,
>  >>
>  >> I updated my webrev.
>  >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhorie/8213754/webrev.04/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.04/>
>  >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.04/>
>  >>
>  >> >0x80 might be a good choice or 0xff.
>  >> I agree,thanks.
>  >>
>  >> >I was wondering about the performance without the PPC specific intrinsic 
> but with the
>  >> >CharacterDataLatin1.java.template code for isDigit being:
>  >> >        return '0' <= ch && ch <= '9';
>  >> I now understand your point,thanks for your explanation. Both on Power9 
> and Skylake, the
>  >> isDigit(ch)using ‘0’…’9’explicitly in CharacterDataLatin1.java.template 
> without PPC specific
>  >> intrinsicwas around 15% faster than the original code that does not 
> include my changes. I fixed my
>  >> change using ‘0’…’9’for this isDigit(ch).
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Best regards,
>  >> --
>  >> Michihiro,
>  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>
>  >> Inactive hide details for Roger Riggs ---2018/12/07 01:23:39---Hi 
> Michihiro, On 12/06/2018 02:38
>  >> AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:Roger Riggs ---2018/12/07 01:23:39---Hi 
> Michihiro, On 12/06/2018 02:38
>  >> AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>
>  >> From: Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  >> To: Michihiro Horie <ho...@jp.ibm.com>
>  >> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net, 
> hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net, martin.do...@sap.com,
>  >> vladimir.koz...@oracle.com, volker.simo...@sap.com
>  >> Date: 2018/12/07 01:23
>  >> Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics for 
> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>
>  >> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Hi Michihiro,
>  >>
>  >> On 12/06/2018 02:38 AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>
>  >>         Hi Roger,
>  >>
>  >>         Thank you for your helpful comments. I updated new webrev, adding 
> a parameter in the jmh
>  >>         test to measure ‘other’ characters and moving the file to an 
> appropriate location, also
>  >>         fixing the indents and copyright year._
>  >>         
> __https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Emhorie_8213754_webrev.03_-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=aKLGn7JZawWsl9UR7H-PyYoTpBc23BAKMqGScywbC5U&e=
>  >>         <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.03/>
>  >>
>  >> The choice of 256 for other is outside the range of Latin1 which is 
> 0..255.
>  >> 0x80 might be a good choice or 0xff.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>         >Is there an opportunity to improve the performance of isDigit 
> using explicit '0'.. '9'
>  >>         >in CharacterDataLatin1.java.template?  The performance would 
> need to be measured and
>  >>         compared.
>  >>         Yes, there is an opportunity: intrinsic performed 25% better than 
> the original on Power9.
>  >>
>  >> I was wondering about the performance without the PPC specific intrinsic 
> but with the
>  >> CharacterDataLatin1.java.template code for isDigit being:
>  >>         return '0' <= ch && ch <= '9';
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>         >Is the profile of in-lining methods changed in any measurable 
> way now that
>  >>         >there is an extra level of method invocation?
>  >>         >    Character.isLowerCase(ch) -> CharacterData.isLowerCase(ch) 
> -> getType(ch) ==
>  >>         LOWERCASE_LETTER;
>  >>         >
>  >>         >instead of:
>  >>         >    Character.isLowerCase(ch) -> getType(ch) == LOWERCASE_LETTER;
>  >>         I missed this point, thanks. I tried jstack but could not find 
> additional level.
>  >>
>  >>         LogCompilation shows CharacterDataLatin1.isLowerCase(ch) is 
> compiled in c1:
>  >>         <nmethod compile_id='71' compiler='c1' level='3' 
> entry='0x00003fff5911cd00' size='1472'
>  >>         address='0x00003fff5911cb90' relocation_offset='344' 
> insts_offset='368' stub_offset='1136'
>  >>         scopes_data_offset='1248' scopes_pcs_offset='1336' 
> dependencies_offset='1448'
>  >>         nul_chk_table_offset='1456' oops_offset='1184' 
> metadata_offset='1192'
>  >>         method='java.lang.CharacterDataLatin1 isLowerCase (I)Z' 
> bytes='15' count='1024'
>  >>         iicount='1025' stamp='0.058'/>
>  >>
>  >> Supposing some existing complex code was already taking advantage of the 
> full allowed inline depth.
>  >> Then adding an extra level might change the inlining behavior.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>         Existing methods in CharacterDataLatin1.java.template etc. 
> directly invoke
>  >>         getProperties(ch), so isLowerCase(ch) would be more aligned with 
> other methods if it looks
>  >>         like as follows?
>  >>         + @HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate
>  >>         + boolean isLowerCase(int ch) {
>  >>         + int props = getProperties(ch);
>  >>         + return (props & $$maskType) == Character.LOWERCASE_LETTER;
>  >>         + }
>  >>
>  >> Yes, that would alleviate my concern.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks, Roger
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>         Best regards,
>  >>         --
>  >>         Michihiro,
>  >>         IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>
>  >>         Inactive hide details for Roger Riggs ---2018/12/06 05:09:36---Hi 
> Michihiro, On 12/05/2018
>  >>         07:21 AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:Roger Riggs ---2018/12/06 
> 05:09:36---Hi Michihiro, On
>  >>         12/05/2018 07:21 AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>
>  >>         From: Roger Riggs _<roger.ri...@oracle.com>_ 
> <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  >>         To: Michihiro Horie _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_ 
> <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>,
>  >>         _vladimir.kozlov@oracle.com_ <mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
>  >>         Cc: _core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net_ 
> <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>,
>  >>         _hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_ 
> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>,
>  >>         _martin.doerr@sap.com_ <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>, 
> _volker.simonis@sap.com_
>  >>         <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>
>  >>         Date: 2018/12/06 05:09
>  >>         Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics for
>  >>         isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>         
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>         Hi Michihiro,
>  >>
>  >>         On 12/05/2018 07:21 AM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>                         >There are a few JMH tests for upper and lower in 
> the
>  >>                         jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks repo. [1]
>  >>                         Here is a jmh webrev for the Character methods._
>  >>                         
> __https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Emhorie_8213754_jmh-2Dwebrev.00_-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=v22au5r5gvv48ufyda1poelXBjJWwuotSFrv-M2AlRY&e=
>  >>                         
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/jmh-webrev.00/> Please include 
> at least one 
> character value that is not a member of any of the classes.
>  >>         The performance impact for 'other' characters is important also.
>  >>
>  >>         The JMH tests have been moved to the OpenJDK jdk/jdk repo in the 
> directory:
>  >>            test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/
>  >>
>  >>         Now that they are in that repo, they can be included with the 
> rest of the changeset.
>  >>                         Also, I updated C2 changes in the latest webrev. 
> (Thank you for giving
>  >>                         valuable comments off-list, Vladimir and Martin!)
>  >>                         With the change in is_disabled_by_flags, I added 
> a JVM flag that will need
>  >>                         another review request. I would proceed for it if 
> this RFR is accepted._
>  >>                         
> __https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Emhorie_8213754_webrev.02_-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=UXQByb5dFxfAwCCppkizqG_-RWf6DhE_PFkr9TsyzKo&e=
>  >>                         
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.02/> The indent in the 
> Java code should 
> be 4 spaces. (Native lib code is 4 spaces, Hotspot is 2
>  >>         spaces)
>  >>
>  >>         Please update the copyrights to include 2018.
>  >>
>  >>         Is there an opportunity to improve the performance of isDigit 
> using explicit '0'.. '9'
>  >>         in CharacterDataLatin1.java.template?  The performance would need 
> to be measured and compared.
>  >>
>  >>         Is the profile of in-lining methods changed in any measurable way 
> now that
>  >>         there is an extra level of method invocation?
>  >>             Character.isLowerCase(ch) -> CharacterData.isLowerCase(ch) -> 
> getType(ch) ==
>  >>         LOWERCASE_LETTER;
>  >>
>  >>         instead of:
>  >>             Character.isLowerCase(ch) -> getType(ch) == LOWERCASE_LETTER;
>  >>
>  >>         Regards, Roger
>  >>                         I need a review on changes in the class library, 
> anyway. Would be grateful
>  >>                         if I could have one.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>                         Best regards,
>  >>                         --
>  >>                         Michihiro,
>  >>                         IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>                         ----- Original message -----
>  >>                         From: Michihiro Horie/Japan/IBM
>  >>                         To: Vladimir Kozlov _<vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
>  >>                         Cc: core-libs-dev 
> _<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>,
>  >>                         _hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>, 
> _martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>, Roger Riggs 
> _<roger.ri...@oracle.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>, 
> _volker.simonis@sap.com_
>  >>                         <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>
>  >>                         Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         Date: Fri, Nov 30, 2018 1:01 PM
>  >>
>  >>                         Hi Vladimir,
>  >>
>  >>                         Thank you for your further comments. I fixed my 
> code, but I’m afraid
>  >>                         discussing such a basic topic involving the two 
> big mailing lists is not
>  >>                         good. Please let me have a chance to talk on this 
> off-list.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>                         Best regards,
>  >>                         --
>  >>                         Michihiro,
>  >>                         IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>
>  >>                         Vladimir Kozlov ---2018/11/30 03:01:42---Hi 
> Michihiro, I still do not
>  >>                         understand which Region node you are swapping. 
> Where it is coming from?
>  >>
>  >>                         From: Vladimir Kozlov 
> _<vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
>  >>                         To: Michihiro Horie _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_ 
> <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>, Roger
>  >>                         Riggs _<roger.ri...@oracle.com>_ 
> <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  >>                         Cc: core-libs-dev 
> _<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>,
>  >>                         _hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>, 
> _martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>, 
> _volker.simonis@sap.com_
>  >>                         <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>
>  >>                         Date: 2018/11/30 03:01
>  >>                         Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>                         Hi Michihiro,
>  >>
>  >>                         I still do not understand which Region node you 
> are swapping. Where it is
>  >>                         coming from?
>  >>
>  >>                         > + // Swap current RegionNode with new one
>  >>
>  >>                         Regards,
>  >>                         Vladimir
>  >>
>  >>                         On 11/28/18 10:31 PM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>                         > Vladimir,Roger,
>  >>                         > Thank you so much for your responses.
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Vladimir,
>  >>                         > Regarding the hotspot change,I’m new in 
> changing around
>  >>                         library_call.cpp,so your comments are very 
> helpful. I will fix
>  >>                         > my code,especially 
> inline_character_compare()would be like:
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > +bool 
> LibraryCallKit::inline_character_compare(vmIntrinsics::ID id){
>  >>                         > + RegionNode* old_rgn = control()->as_Region();
>  >>                         > + RegionNode* new_rgn = new RegionNode(1);
>  >>                         > + record_for_igvn(new_rgn);
>  >>                         > +
>  >>                         > + // Swap current RegionNode with new one
>  >>                         > + Node* new_ctrl = old_rgn->in(1);
>  >>                         > + old_rgn->del_req(1);
>  >>                         > + new_rgn->add_req(new_ctrl);
>  >>                         > +
>  >>                         > + set_control(_gvn.transform(new_rgn));
>  >>                         > +
>  >>                         > + // argument(0)is receiver
>  >>                         > + Node* codePoint = argument(1);
>  >>                         > + Node* n = NULL;
>  >>                         > +
>  >>                         > + switch (id){
>  >>                         > + case vmIntrinsics::_isDigit_c : n = new
>  >>                         DigitCNode(control(),codePoint);break;
>  >>                         > + case vmIntrinsics::_isLowerCase_c : n = new
>  >>                         LowerCaseCNode(control(),codePoint);break;
>  >>                         > + case vmIntrinsics::_isUpperCase_c : n = new
>  >>                         UpperCaseCNode(control(),codePoint);break;
>  >>                         > + case vmIntrinsics::_isWhitespace_c : n = new
>  >>                         WhitespaceCNode(control(),codePoint);break;
>  >>                         > + default:
>  >>                         > + fatal_unexpected_iid(id);
>  >>                         > + }
>  >>                         > +
>  >>                         > + set_result(_gvn.transform(n));
>  >>                         > + return true;
>  >>                         > +}
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Microbenchmark showed ~40% improvements.
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Roger,
>  >>                         > I would wait foryour review,thanks. I 
> understood the discussion had not
>  >>                         been recognized from people in core-libs-dev,and
>  >>                         > checked it was not actually archived there….
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Best regards,
>  >>                         > --
>  >>                         > Michihiro,
>  >>                         > IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Inactive hide details for Roger Riggs 
> ---2018/11/29 11:21:26---Hi, I'll
>  >>                         look at it on Thursday.Roger Riggs ---2018/11/29
>  >>                         > 11:21:26---Hi, I'll look at it on Thursday.
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > From: Roger Riggs _<roger.ri...@oracle.com>_ 
> <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  >>                         > To: Vladimir Kozlov 
> _<vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>, Michihiro 
> Horie _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>, 
> _core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>  >>                         > Cc: _volker.simonis@sap.com_ 
> <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>,
>  >>                         _hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>, 
> _martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>
>  >>                         > Date: 2018/11/29 11:21
>  >>                         > Subject: Re: RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add 
> Intrinsics for
>  >>                         isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > Hi,
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > I'll look at it on Thursday.
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > In spite of it looking like the email was sent 
> to core-lib-dev, I have
>  >>                         > not seen it before
>  >>                         > and its not in the core-libs-dev archive.
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > $.02, Roger
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         > On 11/28/18 7:15 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>  >>                         >  > You still need review from core-libs.
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > About your hotspot changes. You need to add 
> intrinsics to
>  >>                         >  > is_disabled_by_flags() to be able switch 
> them off.
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > Note, match_rule_supported() calls in
>  >>                         >  > C2Compiler::is_intrinsic_supported() 
> executed before intrinsics in C2
>  >>                         >  > are registered. So they will not be 
> available if they are not
>  >>                         >  > supported. match_rule_supported() checks in
>  >>                         >  > LibraryCallKit::inline_character_compare() 
> are not needed.
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > I don't get what you code in
>  >>                         >  > LibraryCallKit::inline_character_compare() 
> is doing. Why you check
>  >>                         >  > Region node at the beginning and why you add 
> Region and Phi at the end
>  >>                         >  > if you have only one path?
>  >>                         >  > You are creating code for whole method which 
> should return boolean result
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > +    boolean isDigit(int ch) {
>  >>                         >  > +      return getType(ch) == 
> Character.DECIMAL_DIGIT_NUMBER;
>  >>                         >  > +    }
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > but your code produce TypeInt::CHAR. why?
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > An finally. Did you compare code generated 
> by default and with you
>  >>                         >  > changes? what improvement you see?
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > Thanks,
>  >>                         >  > Vladimir
>  >>                         >  >
>  >>                         >  > On 11/28/18 3:07 PM, Michihiro Horie wrote:
>  >>                         >  >> Is there any response from core-libs-dev?
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Vladimir,
>  >>                         >  >> Could you give your suggestion on how to 
> proceed?
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> --
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> ----- Original message -----
>  >>                         >  >> From: "Michihiro Horie" 
> _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_ <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>
>  >>                         >  >> Sent by: "hotspot-compiler-dev"
>  >>                         >  >> 
> _<hotspot-compiler-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         
> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net>
>  >>                         >  >> To: "Doerr, Martin" _<martin.do...@sap.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>
>  >>                         >  >> Cc: "Simonis, Volker" 
> _<volker.simo...@sap.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>,
>  >>                         >  >> _"hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net"_
>  >>                         
> <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>_<hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>,
>  >>                         >  >> _"core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net"_
>  >>                         
> <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>  >>                         >  >> Subject: RE: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >> Date: Thu, Nov 22, 2018 11:28 AM
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Hi Martin,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Yes, we should wait for the feedback on 
> class library change.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>  >Btw. I think you can further simplify the 
> code in library_call.cpp
>  >>                         >  >> (no phi). But we can discuss details when 
> thedirection regarding the
>  >>                         >  >> java classes is clear.
>  >>                         >  >> Thank you for pointing out it, I think I 
> understand how to simplify
>  >>                         >  >> code.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>  >Hi Michi,
>  >>                         >  >>  >
>  >>                         >  >>  >On 11/20/2018 02:52 PM, Michihiro Horie 
> wrote:
>  >>                         >  >>  >> >Please note that we don’t have a 
> machine, yet. So other people
>  >>                         >  >> will have to test.
>  >>                         >  >>  >> I think Gustavo can help testing this 
> change when its' ready.
>  >>                         >  >>  >Sure :)
>  >>                         >  >>  >
>  >>                         >  >>  >Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >>  >Gustavo
>  >>                         >  >> Thank you, Gustavo.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> --
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Inactive hide details for "Doerr, Martin" 
> ---2018/11/22 01:33:34---Hi
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro, thanks. This proposal makes the 
> javacode much"Doerr,
>  >>                         >  >> Martin" ---2018/11/22 01:33:34---Hi 
> Michihiro, thanks. This proposal
>  >>                         >  >> makes the java code much moreintrinsics 
> friendly.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> From: "Doerr, Martin" 
> _<martin.do...@sap.com>_
>  >>                         <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>
>  >>                         >  >> To: Michihiro Horie _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_ 
> <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>,
>  >>                         >  >> _"core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net"_
>  >>                         
> <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>  >>                         >  >> Cc: 
> _"hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net"_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>
>  >>                         >  >> _<hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>_
>  >>                         <mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>, 
> "Simonis,
>  >>                         >  >> Volker"_<volker.simo...@sap.com>_ 
> <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>,
>  >>                         Gustavo Romero
>  >>                         >  >> _<grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>_ 
> <mailto:grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>  >>                         >  >> Date: 2018/11/22 01:33
>  >>                         >  >> Subject: RE: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Hi Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> thanks. This proposal makes the java code 
> much more intrinsics friendly.
>  >>                         >  >> We should wait for feedback from the core 
> lib folks. Maybe they have
>  >>                         >  >> some requirements or other proposals.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I think these intrinsics should be 
> interesting for Oracle, Intel and
>  >>                         >  >> others, too.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Btw. I think you can further simplify the 
> code in library_call.cpp
>  >>                         >  >> (no phi). But we can discuss details when 
> thedirection regarding the
>  >>                         >  >> java classes is clear.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> Martin
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> *
>  >>                         >  >> **From:*Michihiro Horie 
> _<ho...@jp.ibm.com>_ <mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com>*
>  >>                         >  >> **Sent:*Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 17:14*
>  >>                         >  >> **To:*core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; 
> Doerr, Martin
>  >>                         >  >> _<martin.do...@sap.com>_ 
> <mailto:martin.do...@sap.com>*
>  >>                         >  >> 
> **Cc:*hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net; Simonis, Volker
>  >>                         >  >> _<volker.simo...@sap.com>_ 
> <mailto:volker.simo...@sap.com>; Gustavo
>  >>                         Romero_<grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>_ 
> <mailto:grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>*
>  >>                         >  >> **Subject:*RE: 8213754: PPC64: Add 
> Intrinsics for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Hi Martin,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I send this RFR to core-libs-dev too, 
> because it changes the class
>  >>                         >  >> library.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Through trial and error, I separated Latin1 
> block as in the _
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         > 
> ___https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Emhorie_8213754_webrev.01-5F-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=co8xQFD19i2JBuYtSh2KKr-qUmwPdt6MEpJErzBfsd0&e=
>  >>                         
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.01_>
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-257Emhorie_8213754_webrev.01-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=w78kALiRtp6DIYAfslpK_TGpubqajF0h32O_z_ITAF4&e=>_/_
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I followed the coding way of 
> Character.isWhitespace() that invokes
>  >>                         >  >> each ChracterData’s isWhitespace() to 
> refactorisDigit(),
>  >>                         >  >> isLowerCase(), and isUpperCase().
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I think this change is also useful on x86, 
> using STTNI.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> --
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> ----- Original message -----
>  >>                         >  >> From: "Michihiro Horie" <_ho...@jp.ibm.com_ 
> <_mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com_>>
>  >>                         >  >> Sent by: "hotspot-compiler-dev"
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> <_hotspot-compiler-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:hotspot-compiler-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net_>>
>  >>                         >  >> To: "Doerr, Martin" <_martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:martin.doerr@sap.com_>>
>  >>                         >  >> Cc: "Simonis, Volker" 
> <_volker.simonis@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:volker.simonis@sap.com_>>,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> "_ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_>"
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> <_ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_>>,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> "_hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_>"
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> <_hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_>>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Subject: RE: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >> Date: Wed, Nov 21, 2018 1:53 AM
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Hi Martin,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Thank you for giving your helpful comments. 
> I did not recognize
>  >>                         >  >> “generate_method_call_static” prevents 
> anyoptimizations, but I now
>  >>                         >  >> checked it actually degraded the 
> performance, thanks.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>  >Please note that we don’t have a machine, 
> yet. So other people will
>  >>                         >  >> have to test.
>  >>                         >  >> I think Gustavo can help testing this 
> change when its' ready.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>  >Would it be possible to introduce more 
> fine-grained intrinsics such
>  >>                         >  >> that the “slow” path is outside of them?
>  >>                         >  >>  >
>  >>                         >  >>  >Maybe you can factor out as in the 
> following example?
>  >>                         >  >>  >if (latin1) return 
> isLatin1Digit(codePoint);
>  >>                         >  >>  >with isLatin1Digit as 
> HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate.
>  >>                         >  >> Thanks for an example, please let me try to 
> separate the Latin block
>  >>                         >  >> from other blocks for some time.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> --
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Inactive hide details for "Doerr, Martin" 
> ---2018/11/20 01:55:27---Hi
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro, first of all, thanks for working 
> onPower9 opt"Doerr,
>  >>                         >  >> Martin" ---2018/11/20 01:55:27---Hi 
> Michihiro, first of all, thanks
>  >>                         >  >> for working on Power9optimizations. Please 
> note that we don't ha
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> From: "Doerr, Martin" 
> <_martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:martin.doerr@sap.com_>>
>  >>                         >  >> To: Michihiro Horie <_ho...@jp.ibm.com_ 
> <_mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com_>>,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> "_hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_>"
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> <_hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_>>,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> "_ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_<_mailto:ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_>"
>  >>                         >  >> <_ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_mailto:ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_>>
>  >>                         >  >> Cc: "Simonis, Volker" 
> <_volker.simonis@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:volker.simonis@sap.com_>>, 
> "Lindenmaier,
>  >>                         >  >> Goetz"<_goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com_>>, 
> Gustavo Romero
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com_<_mailto:grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com_>>
>  >>                         >  >> Date: 2018/11/20 01:55
>  >>                         >  >> Subject: RE: 8213754: PPC64: Add Intrinsics 
> for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Hi Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> first of all, thanks for working on Power9 
> optimizations. Please note
>  >>                         >  >> that we don’t have a machine, yet. So other 
> peoplewill have to test.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I think it may be problematic to insert a 
> slow path by
>  >>                         >  >> “generate_method_call_static”. This may be 
> a performancedisadvantage
>  >>                         >  >> for some users of other encodings because 
> your intrinsics prevent
>  >>                         >  >> inlining and further optimizations.
>  >>                         >  >> Would it be possible to introduce more 
> fine-grained intrinsics such
>  >>                         >  >> that the “slow” path is outside of them?
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Maybe you can factor out as in the 
> following example?
>  >>                         >  >> if (latin1) return isLatin1Digit(codePoint);
>  >>                         >  >> with isLatin1Digit as 
> HotSpotIntrinsicCandidate.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> I can’t judge if this is needed, but I 
> think this should be discussed
>  >>                         >  >> first before going into the details.
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> Martin
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> *
>  >>                         >  >> **From:*Michihiro Horie <_ho...@jp.ibm.com_
>  >>                         <_mailto:ho...@jp.ibm.com_>>*
>  >>                         >  >> **Sent:*Freitag, 16. November 2018 12:53*
>  >>                         >  >> 
> **To:*_hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         
> <_mailto:hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net_>;_ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_mailto:ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net_>*
>  >>                         >  >> **Cc:*Doerr, Martin <_martin.doerr@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> <_mailto:martin.doerr@sap.com_>>; Simonis, 
> Volker
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_volker.simonis@sap.com_<_mailto:volker.simonis@sap.com_>>;
>  >>                         >  >> Lindenmaier, Goetz 
> <_goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com_
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_mailto:goetz.lindenmaier@sap.com_>>;Gustavo Romero
>  >>                         >  >> <_grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com_ 
> <_mailto:grom...@linux.vnet.ibm.com_>>*
>  >>                         >  >> **Subject:*RFR: 8213754: PPC64: Add 
> Intrinsics for
>  >>                         >  >> isDigit/isLowerCase/isUpperCase/isWhitespace
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Dear all,
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Would you please review following change?
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Bug:
>  >>                         > 
> __https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8213754-5F-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=yTUTl4D2EPdboqkkAHXYtHx5KijWhAzXOXPBqwME0iQ&e=
>  >>                         >  >> Webrev:
>  >>                         > 
> __https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-7Emhorie_8213754_webrev.00-5F-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=88Ms75RO8511eAgWMsvWrTDLmRRcxcKiEs_DkSZmVlc&e=
>  >>                         
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emhorie/8213754/webrev.00_>
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >  >> 
> <_https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__cr.openjdk.java.net_-257Emhorie_8213754_webrev.00-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oecsIpYF-cifqq2i1JEH0Q&m=sNklBozv1ZztDu7rnM5SUgqTwPn4CPlp4Gp0uGwfVhs&s=zZl2pxTY0Dn-5RZHkTZSnIRpYzb-w9T_4d8cV7gU3iw&e=>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> This change includes the intrinsics of 
> Character isDigit,
>  >>                         >  >> isLowerCase, isUpperCase, and isWhitespace 
> to support theLatin1 block
>  >>                         >  >> using POWER9’s instructions cmprb and 
> cmpeqb. The cmprb enables to
>  >>                         >  >> compare a character with 1 or 2 
> rangedbytes, while the cmpeqb
>  >>                         >  >> compares one with 1 to 8 values. Simple 
> micro benchmark attached
>  >>                         >  >> showed improvements by 20-40%.
>  >>                         >  >> /
>  >>                         >  >> //(See attached file: Latin1Test.java)/
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >> Best regards,
>  >>                         >  >> --
>  >>                         >  >> Michihiro,
>  >>                         >  >> IBM Research - Tokyo
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >  >>
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>                         >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to