Should I prepare a webrev for this change? -Patrick
Am 13.12.18 um 15:15 schrieb Doug Lea: > On 12/13/18 8:44 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >> This special case could have been handled also by the >> InnocuousForkJoinWorkerThread >> could in my opinion be relaxed to accept null or the system classloader >> to be set >> using setContextClassLoader() > Thanks. We should/will do this. The unconditional throw was clearly too > strong; innocuous calls can be allowed. This doesn't address the general > issues of dynamic security manager installation, but at least removes an > obstacle for people trying to cope. > > I created CR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215359 > > -Doug
