Hello Remi,
You are right, the proposed method names would prevent backwards compatibility,
I forgot to think
about that. Sorry for the trouble.
Maybe a different, currently not used name, such as `areEqual`,
`primitiveEquals` or similar would
be better.
What do You think about the addition of such a method?
Kind regards
> Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> hat am 5. Januar 2019 um 00:50 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
> it's not obvious to me that this is a source backward compatible change.
>
> if you have something like:
> interface Fun { boolean eq(Double a, double b); }
> ...
> Fun fun = Double::equals;
>
> it's not clear to me which variant will be selected ?
>
> regards,
> Rémi
