Hi Lance,
thanks for looking.
> Just starting to take a peek at this and noticed one quick thing in your test:
> ------------
> Paths.get(System.getProperty("test.dir", "."), "testPosix.zip")
> ——————
>
> You do not need the test.dir property or the permission added to test.policy
> to access it, just reference the jar and it will be created in user.dir
> which is
> also writable.
Hm, I thought I didn't want to mess around in "user.dir" as it can be some more
global directory where you wouldn't want to leave artefacts... To me "test.dir"
feels cleaner. Are there other opinions about that?
Thanks
Christoph
