PS Looking more closely, I see the the <code> issue is addressed in the
01 version of the webrev; I was only looking at the 00 version before :-)
Thanks,
-Joe
On 3/21/2019 2:11 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hi Naoto,
Looks okay. The serial-related declarations are still using
<code></code>; I think it is fine to push what you have now, but what
encourage a follow-up bug to replace <code>foo</code> with {@code foo}
throughout the entire class.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 3/21/2019 1:54 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220224
Here is the CSR and proposed changeset:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8220728
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8220224/webrev.01/
DecimalFormatSymbols assumes minus/percent/permille as a single
character, which is not capable of supporting ones for BiDi languages
that involve BiDi formatting characters. With this fix,
DecimalFormatSymbols uses String variants of symbols from CLDR, and
retains them for serialization.
The above webrev contains <code> tag cleanup which was suggested in
the CSR. The following webrev only contains relevant changes to the
issue (excluding those <code> cleanup):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8220224/webrev.00/
Naoto
