Hello,
I would say the text in question is a (slightly incorrect) attempt to
provide some explicit informative implications of the preceding
normative text of the spec, so a CSR is not required for this correction.
(There are other cases where a small correction would require a CSR.)
Thanks; HTH,
-Joe
On 3/21/2019 1:54 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1
And I don't think a CSR is warranted, The text being modified
does not change the behavior, it makes a statement about what
the method does not do. (Which is pretty obvious).
Roger
On 03/21/2019 03:23 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
+1
On Mar 21, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Brian Burkhalter
<[email protected]> wrote:
Please review this trivial fix for [0]:
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
* <code>b[off+len-1]</code> unaffected.
*
* <p> In every case, elements <code>b[0]</code> through
- * <code>b[off]</code> and elements <code>b[off+len]</code>
through
+ * <code>b[off-1]</code> and elements <code>b[off+len]</code>
through
* <code>b[b.length-1]</code> are unaffected.
*
* <p> The <code>read(b,</code> <code>off,</code>
<code>len)</code> method
Also, is a CSR needed for something this small? I assume so ...
Thanks,
Brian
[0] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078860
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance
Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
