Hi Mandy, I could access the JBS now, so part 2 of my reply.
Yesterday, I added tables to the JEP describing what is printed for which bytecode. If this is too verbose for the JEP, it might be nice in the bug implementing it. > > This is a design decision not to make the printout too complex. > This is fine. The JEP should call this out. I added this to the table entry for invokes. > > The algorithm looks at a lot of bytecodes to print the method. I can not > > enumerate all combinations of bytecodes, it's millions. I will add a > > per-bytecode table to > > the "Message content" section describing what is printed for which bytecode. > This is not what I am suggesting to do. > The JEP can describe the known cases or pattern (if enumerating these cases > is not possible) > to help the readers understand the proposed feature and what is not covered. I added the tables to describe this before I got your mail, see above. Best regards, Goetz.
