I also would prefer just "runtime", but "Java.runtime" is at least
better than anything with "Plugin" in the name...
-- Kevin
On 4/17/2019 3:45 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
On 4/17/2019 6:33 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
On 4/17/2019 6:18 PM, semyon.sadet...@oracle.com wrote:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219683
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8219683/webrev.00/
The fix moves Java runtime form Contents/PlugIns/Java.runtime to
Contents/Java.runtime.
--Semyon
Is there any reason "Java.runtime" shouldn't be just "runtime" like
other platforms ?
Please add comment to bug with pointer to webrev.
/Andy
Do we need to modify code in MacAppImageBuilder.signAppBundle() that
treats "Contents/PlugIns" differently than other directories ?
/Andy
