Thank you Martin for review!

On 5/3/19 6:05 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Test should check that Pattern.compile does not return normally, e.g. by throwing AssertionError. Otherwise LGTM.

Well. I think, that OOM in this scenario is a limitation of the current implementation. If the implementation of Pattern changes, so that it won't need to allocate that temp array, then it will not have to necessarily throw, as the pattern is valid.

With kind regards,
Ivan

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:54 PM Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com <mailto:ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Hello!

    A private method Pattern. RemoveQEQuoting() contains calculation
    of an
    array size, which can result in numeric overflow, and cause a
    confusing
    NegativeArraySizeException.

    Would you please help review the fix?

    Please note, that expressions `j + 2` and `pLen - i` cannot overflow
    (because j is the index of a substring "\Q", and i is an index <
    pLen),
    so they are not wrapped with exactXXX() methods.

    BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223174
    WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8223174/00/webrev/
    <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eigerasim/8223174/00/webrev/>

-- With kind regards,
    Ivan Gerasimov


--
With kind regards,
Ivan Gerasimov

Reply via email to