On 16/05/2019 14:14, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Mikael's suggestion seem okay. This is under the hood implementation so
> doesn't matter if there is a follow-on issue or you include it in the
> bigger patch. It might be easier to do the former while it's fresh in
> our minds.
Indeed. I have raised JDK-8224042, patched and tested the code, uploaded
a webrev and posted an RFR (T) to core-libs-dev. Reviews welcome!
regards,
Andrew Dinn
-----------
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander
