On 7/20/19 8:08 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 19/07/2019 17:20, Mandy Chung wrote:
This was a follow up to the observation during the code review
of JDK-82193798.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8219774/webrev.01/
This cleanup looks good to me. A minor nit is that ReflectAccess is in
jl.reflect so the usages in say AccessibleObject don't need to use the
fully qualified class name.
Thanks for the review. Good catch on AccessibleObject and I have
updated it to call "new ReflectAccess()".
Mandy
