On 8/13/19 3:33 AM, Mandy Chung wrote: > On 8/12/19 5:13 PM, Frederic Parain wrote: > 96 // VM adds 1 to the code index to StackFrameInfo::bci field such that > 97 // zero (and negative values) indicates invalid BCI. So substract 1. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8193325/webrev.04/
I still do not understand the purpose of @Stable here. It seems to complicate the whole thing, and for what, exactly? Why can't we be happy with just "final int bci"? -Aleksey
