At least a couple appear to be recently active, though I don't have current access. Maybe an IDE generates boilerplate for proxies and ignores deprecation ?
is the speed of the StackWalker approach to counting frames comparable to the current native method ? On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:57 AM Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 23/10/2019 16:25, seth lytle wrote: > > With respect to "unable to find anything that uses it", a quick search > > of the code that I have access to shows some usage, though everything > > I looked at in any depth is either a test or a proxy, so there will be > > source code changes required. I've never thought about what the right > > way to handle proxying a deprecated method is. > > > Is this maintained code (or tests)? I find it hard to see how anything > could depend on it. The deprecated warning has been there since 1998, > the for-removal warning since JDK 9, so I assume the warnings are being > ignored. > > -Alan
