On 11/14/19 5:04 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Mandy,
On 15/11/2019 10:51 am, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 11/14/19 8:04 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 11/14/19 2:33 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/11/2019 04:57, Mandy Chung wrote:
Updated in place:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8233527/webrev.02/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14/8233527/specdiff/
The addition of hasFullPrivilegeAccess looks okay and probably the
right thing to do.
For the @deprecated message on the old method it might be simpler
to say that the method was originally designed to test PRIVATE
access but has since changed to test full privilege access.
It was designed to test full privilege access while private access
implies full privilege access as a Lookup with private access
includes module access.
I updated to:
This method was originally designed to test PRIVATE access that
implies full privilege access but PRIVATE access has since become
independent of PRIVATE access. It is recommended to call
hasFullPrivilegeAccess() instead.
That doesn't read correctly: "PRIVATE" is independent of "PRIVATE" ??
Dunno how I got that typo :( thanks for catching it.
This method was originally designed to test PRIVATE access that implies
full privilege access but MODULE access has since become independent of
PRIVATE access. It is recommended to call hasFullPrivilegeAccess() instead.
Mandy
David
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk14//8233527/specdiff/java.base/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.Lookup.html
Mandy
