If you remove the deprecated constructor, the compiler will add a default one. Wouldn't it be a better idea to make the deprecated constructor private and throwing an exception?
Em seg., 9 de dez. de 2019 às 14:13, Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> escreveu: > Looks good. > > Mandy > > On 12/8/19 10:58 AM, Joe Darcy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Please review this small API changes for JDK 15: > > > > JDK-8230771: Remove terminally deprecated constructors in java.base > > CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235548 > > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8230771.0/ > > > > Patch below. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Joe > > > > --- > > old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ConstantBootstraps.java > > 2019-12-08 10:56:14.223168685 -0800 > > +++ > > new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/ConstantBootstraps.java > > 2019-12-08 10:56:13.999168685 -0800 > > @@ -40,12 +40,6 @@ > > * @since 11 > > */ > > public final class ConstantBootstraps { > > - /** > > - * Do not call. > > - */ > > - @Deprecated(forRemoval=true, since="14") > > - public ConstantBootstraps() {} > > - > > // implements the upcall from the JVM, > > MethodHandleNatives.linkDynamicConstant: > > /*non-public*/ > > static Object makeConstant(MethodHandle bootstrapMethod, > > --- old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java > > 2019-12-08 10:56:14.775168685 -0800 > > +++ new/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Modifier.java > > 2019-12-08 10:56:14.555168685 -0800 > > @@ -44,13 +44,6 @@ > > */ > > public class Modifier { > > /** > > - * Do not call. > > - */ > > - @Deprecated(forRemoval=true, since="14") > > - public Modifier() {} > > - > > - > > - /** > > * Return {@code true} if the integer argument includes the > > * {@code public} modifier, {@code false} otherwise. > > * > > > >
