+1
-Joe
On 12/12/19 2:07 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Sorry, I seem to have posted an old webrev, which included unnecessary
retrieval of the generic name (4168-4173 in v.00). Here is the correct
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8235238/webrev.01/
Naoto
On 12/12/19 1:37 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1
There's quite a bit of work being done to get the eligible stings
as part of each parse but it doesn't look easy to re-use it acrosses
parses.
Roger
On 12/12/19 3:42 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
On 12/12/19 12:31 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
Thank you for the review.
The original code loops through zoneStrings array, and if the id
exists in regionIds, then adds their display names in the tree
(4142-4154). This process is not altered with my change. My change
made regionIds mutable (line 4127) so that after the loop, it only
contains custom ids by calling remove() (line 4144). Thus the new
added block will only retrieve names for custom ids. Or am I
missing something in your comment?
Ok, that's what I was looking for. Thanks for the explanation. The
changes look good to me then.
Best,
Joe
Naoto
On 12/12/19 11:32 AM, Joe Wang wrote:
Hi Naoto,
Does the new code block, 4156 - 4174, need a conditional
statement, that is when it's for a standard timezon? Before this
change, or before a custom TimeZoneNameProvider is attempted, the
process didn't need to loop through regionIds to add display names.
Thanks,
Joe
On 12/11/19 1:21 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235238
The proposed changeset is located at:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8235238/webrev.00/
The fix will retrieve the custom zone names from the time zone
name provider, for the custom ZoneRulesProvider implementations.
Naoto
