Paul, thank you very much!

  In the meantime I did more reading about VarHandles and understood better
the "philosophy" of coordinates and it made sense (eventually I was able to
fix my own issues).
  Also, thank you for sharing Maurizio's talk - I will refer it in my
examples. Speaking of sharing - these days I will finish my examples on JEP
370 and will share them with you as well (there will be a github + some
youtube introduction to the feature).
  I think that the capability to allocate more than 2GB of memory is going
to be a hit!

Cheers!
  Chris T

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Thanks for pointing out the inconsistencies.
>
> I modified the JEP with updated code snippets that compile against the
> latest API in JDK 14 [*].
>
> The handle created “withStride” requires an additional coordinate the is
> an offset from the base address.
>
> You may find Maurizio’s recent talk at Fosdem 2020 helpful and informative:
>
>   https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/bytebuffers/
>
> Hth,
> Paul.
>
> [*] I wish there was a way to automate the compile and test of such
> snippets without duplication.
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2020, at 7:23 PM, Chris T <tech.mesh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I tried to build an example on top of this code snippet (from the JEP
> text):
>
> VarHandle intHandle = MemoryHandles.varHandle(int.class);
> VarHandle intElemHandle = MemoryHandles.withStride(intHandle, 4);
>
> try (MemorySegment segment = MemorySegment.allocateNative(100)) {
>   MemoryAddress base = segment.baseAddress();
>   for (int i = 0 ; i < 25 ; i++) {
>        intElemHandle.set(base, (long)i);
>   }
> }
>
> The first issue was that the API for the first line need to get the
> ByteOrder parameter (that's not a big deal). I ended up with this:
>
>    VarHandle intHandle = MemoryHandles.varHandle(int.class, order);
>    VarHandle intElemHandle = MemoryHandles.withStride(intHandle, 4);
>
>    try (MemorySegment segment = MemorySegment.allocateNative(100)) {
>      MemoryAddress base = segment.baseAddress();
>      for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
>        // this is the line where the app crashes:
>        intElemHandle.set(base, (long) i);
>      }
>    }
>
> The issue that I have is that the code crashes with:
> java.lang.invoke.WrongMethodTypeException: cannot convert
> MethodHandle(VarHandle,MemoryAddressProxy,long,int)void to
> (VarHandle,MemoryAddress,long)void
> at
>
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.asTypeUncached(MethodHandle.java:880)
> at java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.asType(MethodHandle.java:865)
> at
>
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.VarHandleGuards.guard_LJ_V(VarHandleGuards.java:184)
> at
>
> com.github.kbnt.java14.fma.ForeignMemoryAccessExamples.exampleXXStrides(ForeignMemoryAccessExamples.java:65)
> at
>
> com.github.kbnt.java14.fma.ForeignMemoryAccessExamples.main(ForeignMemoryAccessExamples.java:25)
>
> Any idea why this happens (and more importantly how the code can be
> changed)?
>
> Thanks!
>  Chris T
>
>
>

Reply via email to