OK, thanks Roger, I am looking for the opportunity of speeding up indexOf, and would fix it by the way once I have a patch there.
Regards Patrick -----Original Message----- From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Roger Riggs Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:12 AM To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Should indexOfLatin1Unsafe be private instead of public in java\lang\StringUTF16.java? Hi Patrick, Private would be good, but since they are in a package-private class they are not visibile outside the package. If there is some other change to the class then fix it but otherwise not worth the overhead. Roger On 2/13/20 10:34 AM, Patrick Zhang OS wrote: > Hi, > > A quick question, > I read the code snippets of indexOf(String str), found indexOfUnsafe [1] and > indexOfLatin1Unsafe [2] have different access control, but it looks both > should be private. Did I miss any outer caller or any other restriction? > Thanks for your comment. > > [1] private static int indexOfUnsafe(byte[] value, int valueCount, > byte[] str, int strCount, int fromIndex) > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/cf6409153216/src/java.base/sha > re/classes/java/lang/StringUTF16.java#l392 > [2] public static int indexOfLatin1Unsafe(byte[] src, int srcCount, > byte[] tgt, int tgtCount, int fromIndex) > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/cf6409153216/src/java.base/sha > re/classes/java/lang/StringUTF16.java#l440 > > Regards > Patrick >
