Hi Alan,
The mismatches are due to the combination of generated Stub and old stub
source.
I'll clean it up a bit before pushing. As pretty static code it didn't
seem worth much investment.
Thanks, Roger
On 3/19/20 3:39 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/03/2020 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi,
Some small updates to the source files to minimize the changes to
javadoc
of the _Stub classes.
All looks good but the updated ActivationGroup_Stub should probably
get a one-pass to eliminate the inconsistencies, e.g. the new version
imports some java.rmi.* classes but uses qualified class names in
several places. There is unusual formatting in several places, e.g.
L90/91. So just nits but since the entire line is changed then maybe
run get the IDE to tidy it up before pushing.
-Alan
