Hi Paul,
as Martin said, the original bug could not be opened by Oracle. I, however
changed the bug created by Martin to a Backport item. Doing it that way would
allow a "standard" backport of such type of issues while the original item that
was pushed to head can remain invisible. We proceeded like that with other bugs
already and it proved to work nicely.
Best regards
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf
> Of Hohensee, Paul
> Sent: Montag, 23. März 2020 19:29
> To: Doerr, Martin <martin.do...@sap.com>; core-libs-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(S): 8223326: Regression introduced by CPU sync:
> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
> ("java.net.NetPermission" "setSocketImpl")
>
> The changeset references JDK-8223326, which is private. If possible, ask
> Oracle to make it public so we can do a normal backport rather than file an
> 11u-specific issue. The backport itself looks fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On 3/23/20, 11:08 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Doerr, Martin" <jdk-
> updates-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net on behalf of
> martin.do...@sap.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to backport JDK-8223326 from jdk/jdk.
>
> 11u backport issue:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241460
>
> Original change:
> https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/29624901d8bc
>
> 11u backport webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8223326_nio_socket_11u/webrev.00/
>
> I had to integrate the change manually due to context changes. However,
> the new code fits to the 11u versions.
>
> Please review.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
