Hi Bin,
On 24/04/2020 7:28 pm, buddyliao(廖彬) wrote:
Dear all,
As Lin mentioned, I found the copyright info is not updated, so I prepared a
patch to fix this. Lin helps me to build an issue in the jdk bug system. Would
you help me to review this patch? Thank you very much.
Patch link: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzang/BuddyLiao/launcher/webrev/
Issue link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243539
Please create a new RFR email thread for this follow up issue.
Thanks,
David
BRs,
Bin
在 2020/4/24 上午10:38，“linzang(臧琳)”<linz...@tencent.com> 写入:
Hi Henry, Alan, David
My colleague Bin(Buddy) just remind me that the copyright info of
the touched files should be updated, sorry that I forgot to add it in my
original patch , do you think there should be a patch for fixing that?
BRs,
Lin
On 2020/4/7, 4:56 PM, "Alan Bateman" <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 06/04/2020 18:36, Henry Jen wrote:
> Here is the combined webrev[1] which I think is what we should have.
By using __solaris__, we make sure no extra define from build and assuming that
all solaris build will have gethrtime() and use that.
>
> The current build only use that for static build launcher, not
custom launcher use libjli.
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk/8241638.2/webrev/
>
I think it would be simpler to drop the macros and have function
prototypes in java_md_sollinux.h. That would avoid preprocessor code in
the header file. The implementation in java_md_sollinux.c would then be
simple #ifdef __solaris ... #else ... Minor nit is that the #include
<sys/time.h> should probably be moved up to the top with the other
includes.
-Alan.
