A small point… you might want to reconsider your analysis of Set.copyOf(), as it is a static method and there is no receiver.
- RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSet.removeAll semantics are ... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSet.removeAll seman... Jason Mehrens
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSet.removeAll s... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSet.removeA... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSet.rem... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: AbstractSe... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Abstra... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Jason Mehrens
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Jason Mehrens
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Jason Mehrens
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Stuart Marks
- Re: RFR [15] 6394757: rev2: Ab... Alan Snyder