On 5/22/20 1:53 PM, Claes Redestad wrote: > Do you have any example of a case when one of the fallbacks was used to > work around any issues? We've heard of no such case.
For example, the bug in j.l.invoke caused semantic bug in String concat: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200118 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194554 > BC_SB has a rather intricate dependency on ASM, and recent stabilization > work done to the default strategy will need to be duplicated. If we were > to keep a fallback (which I don't think we actually need), I'd prefer > keeping either MH_SB_SIZED or MH_SB_SIZED_EXACT. See above. I believe we better have the fallback that does not enter the meat of j.l.invoke at all. -- Thanks, -Aleksey
