Hi Joe,
I kind of understand your point of being more at ease with the porting
itself than with the review.
However, wouldn't a review be needed anyway, regardless how
knowledgeable the porter might be? That is, even if an expert like
yourself does the port, somebody else would still have to invest time to
do the review, I guess, so the overall combined effort would be almost
the same. At least, that's my understanding on how development in the
OpenJDK works.
Anyway, although I'm not formally a reviewer, just a contributor, I'll
be glad to review your code on an informal basis if you need an
additional opinion.
Greetings
Raffaello
On 2020-05-27 23:44, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Raffaello,
Finishing the fdlibm port remains on my to-do list. Given the review
investment needed, I would not find it helpful for someone else to
contribute a port.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 5/25/2020 9:24 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Hi,
[1] enumerates 14 StrictMath native functions that still need a Java
porting from the original C code.
As of changeset b84f122ea855 all of them are still native, so I wonder
if it makes sense to contribute or if they have already been ported
and on the launch pad for integration.
Let me know.
Greetings
Raffaello
----
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171407
