On 6/16/20 5:15 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
The caching is on a per-stream-field shape basis, which should be consistent in 
the common case, but of course is not always guaranteed to be the case, hence 
the need for the cache. I think that this should be fine, since the 
ObjectStreamClass ( that holds the cache ) is already itself cached as a weak 
reference. But I did wonder if the size of this new cache should be limited. 
Probably not worth the complexity unless it is an obvious issue.

I don't think there will normally be many different shapes of the same class deserialized by a single VM. Each shape means that a different version of that class must have existed to serialize it. There could be deliberate "forged" streams trying to inflate the cache. Are you worried about that? In that case I can add logic to limit the number of different shapes kept with a simple LRA (Least Recently Added) strategy that would not hurt access performance.


Regards, Peter



Reply via email to