Hi Patrick,
In the test(s), you often use sink::accept:
exerciseOps(data, s -> s.mapMulti((e, sink) ->
IntStream.range(0, e).forEach(sink::accept)));
...where you could simply pass just sink:
exerciseOps(data, s -> s.mapMulti((e, sink) ->
IntStream.range(0, e).forEach(sink)));
Is this intentional and why?
Regards, Peter
On 7/2/20 6:45 PM, Patrick Concannon wrote:
Hi Remi,
Well spotted on the bad link. I’ve updated that now.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8238286/webrevs/webrev.03/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8238286/webrevs/webrev.03/>
As for the placement of the new FIs, it was decided that once we can use
primitive types in generics the need for these interfaces will hopefully fade,
and it was deemed better to keep them closer together for this reason. This
approach also has the benefit of reducing the exposure / footprint of the
general functional interfaces.
Kind regards,
Patrick
On 2 Jul 2020, at 15:30, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
Hi Patrick & Julia,
this version starts to look good.
I just don't understand why the new functional interfaces are not in
java.util.function like the other ones ?
(BTW, in the javadoc, the link to the summary overview point to the wrong one,
to java.util.stream and not java.util.function).
About the examples, i will try to think about that this evening :)
regards,
Rémi
----- Mail original -----
De: "Patrick Concannon" <patrick.concan...@oracle.com>
À: "Julia Boes" <julia.b...@oracle.com>
Cc: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Envoyé: Jeudi 2 Juillet 2020 15:30:45
Objet: Re: RFR[8238286]: 'Add new flatMap stream operation that is more
amenable to pushing’
Hi,
John: Thanks for your feedback. We've rearranged the ordering of the parameters
of the BiConsumer to follow the convention you suggested, and hopefully improve
readability going forward. Additional FIs (IntObjConsumer, etc.) have been
added as sub-interfaces to the corresponding Stream classes i.e. {Int, Double,
Long}Stream.
Remi: Your argument makes sense, and we have updated the BiConsumers generic
type to `<? super Consumer<R>>` as you suggested. Thanks for pointing this out.
We have also removed the caching.
WRT to the wrappers used in the examples: good examples are tough to nail down.
We think the examples in their current form do a good job of demonstrating how
the method can be used, but we welcome any alternative suggestions.
The changes discussed can be found in the updated webrev below.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8238286/webrevs/webrev.02/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8238286/webrevs/webrev.02/>
Kind regards,
Patrick
On 26 Jun 2020, at 17:46, Julia Boes <julia.b...@oracle.com> wrote:
w
